You see, I'd been reflecting all day on my bold claim that gold and its miners could be about to take a great leap forward, given the RSI, Slow Stochastic, and rock-bottom sentiment. I'd nervously watched the HUI crash down to 462 (where I spent the last of GM's snuff money without his knowledge) before sitting back to watch it gallop back up to 476 [now 481 at the time of typing]. I was confident in my analysis, but something still niggled. What could be the technical justification for a sudden sharp move in gold, which has been staying stubbornly low? What chart formation could back up all this fancy stochastic/RSI stuff?
My 'Head and Shoulders' shampoo [Reader: "I didn't know you had dandruff, Jeanne."] [Jeanne: "I don't - I have nits. What of it?"] set me thinking of something GM wrote a month ago:
...note that if gold drops say 5% from here [gold was at $1726 at the time of writing], that would begin the last part of a major inverse head and shoulders pattern (perhaps even more so in silver) that would probably get the technical funds going strong long.Hmm, well, gold has certainly dropped since 19 February, when GM wrote this. Let's see: $1726 - 5% = $1640. Interesting. Would that be the same $1640 that has been serving so heroically as stubborn support recently? You know, I think it jolly well might be. I therefore present to you the most beautiful Inverse Head and Shoulders you're likely to see for a while:
For a basic introduction to the Inverse Head and Shoulders chart formations, please see here, here or here. Essentially, the formation consists of two peaks (or 'shoulders') separated by a trough (the 'head'). It follows a downtrend (usually a sharp one, as in this gold chart), and - if it is a true Inverse Head and Shoulders it will be followed by a move to retest the Neckline (at around $1800 on this chart). If it passes through the Neckline, then a strong bull move is in play, and will often continue for the same price difference as between the Head and the Neckline. In the gold chart, above, this price difference is around $250 - 275, which would mean the Inverse Head and Shoulders formation and its resulting breakout would perhaps complete at $2050 - 2075, before a likely new correction comes into play.
Now I've described this chart as a 'beautiful' IH&S because of its good symmetry. In practice, a 'perfect' IH&S is never achieved, as the markets obviously fluctuate away from the mean trend lines, and are influenced by events and fundamentals rather than pure buying and selling (based on sentiment alone). But our example here is striking for the relative evenness of its two shoulders, and - most importantly - the near symmetrical distance between each shoulder and the neckline. I've rarely seen such a good set up for an IH&S, I have to admit. Even when we get into the substructure, one sees parallels in both shoulders, with 1 corresponding well with 1' and 2 with 2'.
But it's not yet an IH&S. Not at all. Because we now need 3' to correspond with 3 (which could imply a retest of $1625, although 3' may just end up being a small version of 3, in which case no retest is necessary), and then that all important dash for the Neckline and (hopefully, for the bulls) beyond. And that's still quite a big "if". However, if we combine this lovely formation with the analysis from RSI, stochastics, sentiment, etc., then it does feel rather as if the stars are beginning to align.
This feels particularly convincing when one considers that there are more than a few IH&S kicking around at the moment. Let's take a look at a couple more:
So, it's all about the IH&Ss for commodity bulls at the moment. But let's go back to my εὕρηκα moment in the bath. I'd been holding the bottle upside down (i.e. inversed), trying to squeeze out the last little bit, having no shampoo money left after spending it all on miners yesterday. But as I put the (now empty) bottle back on the shelf, and saw it sitting there the right way up again, another thought struck me: what about a good old-fashioned Head and Shoulders?
The bears could conceivably argue that GM's predicted massive IH&S is in fact just two sets of a Head and Shoulders formation, with our substructure, 1', 2' and 3', making up the the two shoulders and the head, viz.:
This could portend a sharp drop to the downside. But it's an ugly formation - no poise, no style. The neckline is extremely slanted, and the two shoulders very uneven. And its equally disfigured twin H&S formation to the left of the chart seems an equally unlikely structure.
It was then that I had my final moment of bathroom inspiration, whilst looking in the mirror after gently drying myself off. I spoke softly the treasured words of Keats:
A thing of beauty is a joy forever: its loveliness increases; it will never pass into nothingness.Switching my gaze from shampoo bottle, to mirror, to gold daily chart, I knew then that Keats had called this next gold move correctly, way back in 1818.